December 10, 2006

Nevada's Online State News Journal

 

.
   
 
Nevada History:

 [From James G. Scrugham, Nevada: The Narrative of the Conquest of a Frontier Land (1935), vol. I, pp. 221-242]

X

THE NEW STATE AND THE FISCAL PROBLEMS

            Under the terms of the enabling act the constitution was submitted for ratification or rejection on "the first Wednesday of September," 1864. It was adopted by an overwhelming majority. The vote of Lander County was not certified to the board of canvassers in time to be considered, but the tabulated vote of the other counties was as follows :

                             Yes                   No

Washoe County ------ 1,055------------115

Nye County-------------- 148-------------53

Humboldt County------- 320----------- 544

Ormsby County--------- 999------------- 90

Churchill County------- 178------------ 100   

Storey County-------- 5,448------------ 142

Douglas County-------- 470-------------- 76

Esmeralda County----- 859-------------- 72

Lyon County----------- 898-------------- 92

                            ------                 ------

Total Yes -------------10,375 Total No---1,284

Majority in favor of the Constitution----9,091

Governor Nye then certified the results of the vote to the President of the United States, together with a copy of the constitution and ordinance. On October 31, 1864, the President issued the following proclamation :

Whereas, the Congress of the United States passed an Act, which was approved on the 21st day of March last, entitled "An Act to enable the people of Nevada to form a Constitution and State Government, and for the admission of each State into the Union on an equal footing with the original States:"

And whereas, the said Constitution and State Government have been formed, pursuant to the conditions pre-scribed by the fifth section of the Act of Congress aforesaid, and the certificate required by the said Act, and also a copy of the Constitution and ordinances, have been submitted to the President of the United States :

Now, therefore, be it known, that I, Abraham Lincoln, President of the United States, in accordance with the duty imposed upon me by the Act of Congress aforesaid, do hereby declare and proclaim that the said State of Nevada is admitted into the Union on an equal footing with the original states.

In witness whereof, I have hereunder set my hand, and caused the seal of the United States to be affixed.

221

222      NEVADA

Done at the city of Washington this thirty-first day of October, in the year of our Lord one thousand eight hundred and sixty--four, and of the independence of the United States the eighty-ninth.

                                                       ABRAHAM LINCOLN.

By the President :

William H. Seward, Secretary of State.

Nine days later, on November 8, 1864, 16,328 "qualified electors" of the State of Nevada voted for presidential electors, congressmen, all state officers and members of the Legislature. The "Union" or republican ticket was elected throughout, the vote for the office of governor being : Republican, 9,834; Democrat, 6,555. Nevada's first congressman was H. G. Worthington. The first elective officers in the executive department were : H. G. Blasdel, Governor; J. S. Crosman, Lieutenant Governor; C. N. Noteware, Secretary of State; E. Rhoades, State Treasurer; A. W. Nightingill, State Comptroller ; S. H. Marlette, Surveyor General ; George A. Nourse, Attorney-General ; and A. F. White, Superintendent of Public Instruction. Members of the Supreme Court elected at that time were : J. F. Lewis, Chief Justice ; H. O. Beatty and C. M. Brosnan.

The regular term of state officers except judges prescribed in the constitution was for four years. However, the schedule provided that such officers elected at the first election should have terms of a little more than two years, until January, 1867. Thus the first election for four year term officials would occur in 1866 and every four years subsequent to. While the constitution likewise made provision for biennial legislatures, it was anticipated that there would be a great deal of readjustment of the laws to the constitution of the new state, and consequently pro-vision was made that the first Legislature should meet in December, 1864, while the second Legislature should meet in January, 1866, and the first of the biennial sessions should commence in January, 1867.

Problem of Revenue

The State Legislature convened for its first session December 12, 1864. Two days later Governor Blasdel sent in his first annual message. The first and biggest problem confronting the state government was that of revenue, where and how to get the money to carry the burden of debt inherited from the territory, approximately $267,000, and with no prospect of an income for several months to fill the empty treasury. "Not an encouraging prospect," declared the governor, "but one understood by our constituents when they decided to adopt a state government." He estimated that the expenses of the state government for the ensuing year would approximate $175,000, exclusive of the principal and interest of the territorial debt, amounting to $92,000. But the revenue for the last fiscal year was about $70,000. To raise a revenue to fill up this deficiency the governor proposed a general levy of 1 per cent on all real and personal property, also a general license tax, and a "stamp tax" similar to the stamp taxes then imposed by the Federal government as a war measure. A bond issue would also be necessary to provide for immediate wants. The governor made no specific reference to taxing the proceeds of the mines, but his message contains one interesting

NEVADA        223

paragraph that is a commentary on a matter that has been previously discussed, as to the customs or laws by which the pioneers were permitted to come into this portion of the public domain and dig wealth from its mountains :

Last winter some alarm was created by a proposition, discussed in Congress, to tax the proceeds of the mines. The title to these is unquestionably held by the general government, and our people rest their claims thereto on possession alone. But the Federal government has so long acquiesced in the tenure relied upon, not only in Nevada but in all the Pacific states, and by its non-interference invited and induced its citizens to embark in the hazardous pursuits of mining, that vast amounts of labor and capital have been laid out and expended, upon the implied assurance that there would be no departure from what seemed to have become the fixed and settled policy of the country. Upon this tacit understanding, extending over a period of fifteen years, the miner and the capitalist have been stimulated to assume the risk of an uncertain calling. The adventurer, permitted to enjoy the undivided fruits of his toils, encouraged by that fostering care so generously extended to the citizens of the republic, has predicated his plans and calculations upon an acquiescence indulged in by the government, so long as to well nigh make it a rule of property. . . . . Enterprise and adventure should be encouraged to continue the search for treasure unrestrained and unincumbered. That such will be the continued policy of the government, I have no serious doubt.[1]

On January 18, 1865, the Senate Ways and Means Committee submitted a report comprising a general financial plan to maintain the credit of the state. This report makes an analysis of the different parts of the territorial debt. What was known as the Parrott bonds for $150,000 bore interest at the rate of one and one-half per cent per month. The Reis bonds for $15,000 had an interest rate of ten per cent per annum. The Curry or State Prison bonds, for $62,000, were more in the form of interest bearing war-rants than bonds, and the "faith and credit of the territory" was not pledged to pay them. There was also $40,000 represented in territorial warrants which did not bear interest.

To pay off this territorial indebtedness the constitution permitted a special tax levy of not to exceed one-fourth of one per cent. The net proceeds of such a tax would amount to about $50,000 a year, an amount scarcely sufficient to pay the principal installments and interest on the existing territorial debt. Combining the debt obligations with the estimated expenses of the state until January, 1866, the committee figured that approximately $260,000 revenue must be raised. Five sources of revenue were proposed : A tax of ninety-five cents on each hundred dollars valuation; a tax of one per cent on the proceeds of the mines; a stamp tax ; a capitation tax of one dollar on every passenger leaving the state by any public conveyance; and a poll tax of four dollars on every male inhabitant between the ages of twenty-one and sixty.

224      NEVADA

The revenue measures adopted by the first Legislature, largely along the lines proposed by the above committee, illustrate among other things the high cost of public financing at that time. In order to pay the expenses of the state government during the first year and to put the finances of the state on a cash basis, one act authorized a $150,000 bond issue. It was a short term issue, pay-able a year from date, at an interest rate not exceeding 2 per cent per month. As illustrating the prejudice against the "legal tender" paper money, it was provided that none of the bonds could be sold for or redeemed in "any currency except gold and silver coin of the United States." As security for this bond issue the act levied an "ad valorem tax of ninety-five cents" on each hundred dollars of taxable property in the state, all the revenue from this source to be set aside and pledged for the payment of the principal and interest of the bonds.

The acts of February 14 and March 10 authorized an issue of state bonds not to exceed $160,000 for the purpose of funding the territorial prison bonds and other outstanding warrants and claims included in the territorial debt. These bonds were payable January 1, 1870, and bore 10 per cent interest. The bonds of this issue increased the state debt by approximately $116,000. Besides these state bonds, aggregating in principal about $266,000, there were unpaid at the end of 1865 territorial bonds to the amount of $171,666. For the interest and redemption of the state bonds for the territorial debt there was levied a tax of twenty-five cents on the hundred.

Taxes in 1865

To take care of this bonded debt and interest and provide the current expenses of state government was the purpose of the general revenue act of March 9, 1865. By the terms of the constitution the state was limited to a levy of 1 per cent on assessed valuation for general revenues and a quarter of 1 per cent to pay off the territorial debt. The quarter of 1 per cent had already been pledged for the bond issue above noted, and 95 per cent of the 1 per cent limit had been pledged for the state bond issue for current expenses. That left only five cents on each hundred dollars, which this act levied for the support and maintenance of state university and common schools. Thus the bonded debt exhausted practically all of the ordinary revenues of the state. The Legislature then proceeded to lay the special forms of tax proposed by the governor and the Ways and Means Committee. The first of these was the poll tax of four dollars a head, the proceeds to be divided equally between the state and county treasuries. It is interesting to note that the Legislature did not make the payment of poll tax a condition for voting.

By this law nearly every form of business was subjected to a license tax—bankers, brokers, liquor dealers, theaters and other amusement places, transportation companies, etc. To appreciate the variety and scope of all the taxes proposed in this act the modern reader must recall some of the many special taxes levied during the World war. The modern gasoline tax had perhaps an analogy in the "passenger tax" of 1865. Every firm engaged in the transportation of persons in and out of the state had to collect a tax of one dollar for every person leaving the state by railroad, stage coach or other vehicle which was part of an organized transportation system.

NEVADA        225

The Federal government had been raising revenue during the war by means of a stamp tax on checks, bills of lading, legal instruments and other documents. Nevada by this act followed the example of the Federal government and prescribed a schedule of stamp duties on affidavits, bills of exchange, drafts and notes, bonds, various types of certificates, and on a score or more of other business and legal forms.

Mine Tax

After all the discussion over the proposition to tax the mines or the proceeds of the mines in the Constitutional Convention, one approaches the provisions of this revenue act concerning the mine tax with considerable curiosity. It provides "an ad valorem tax

[picture]

OLD UNION SHAFT, VIRGINIA CITY

of one hundred cents on each one hundred dollars valuation (after the deduction for cost of extracting and reducing as provided in this act)" to be levied on "all ores, quartz or minerals from which gold and silver, or either, is extracted by any mill, arastra, smelting furnace or any process whatever in this state." But it is to be noticed that this was the total tax to be levied "for state and county purposes," and also that from the gross return or assessed value per ton, there was to be deducted the sum of twenty dollars per ton, and the tax was to be levied and collected only on 75 per cent of the remainder. The first section of this act authorized the levy of ad valorem taxes for state purposes to the limit of $1.25 per hundred dollars, and $1.50 for county purposes, whereas the total ad valorem tax, for both county and state purposes, on the proceeds of the mines, after the deductions above noted, was only one hundred cents on the hundred dollars. Consequently on a ton of ore that worked one hundred dollars, the total tax that could be levied and collected under this law was sixty cents, while other

226      NEVADA

forms of taxable property was subject to a total tax of $2.75 per hundred.

The revenues derived from this law did not measure up to expectations, but the state controller declared that this was due largely to the depreciation in value of the assessable property of the state. One provision that had been practically inoperative was that of the passenger act. Only $272.08 were paid into the state treasury from that source during the first year. The Pioneer Stage Company had refused to make returns according to the law and the case was finally brought up to the Supreme Court, which rendered an opinion May 31, 1865, declaring the law constitutional. From that decision there was taken a writ of error and the matter was transferred to the United States Supreme Court. The receipts from the property tax of 1865 were approximately $150,000; from the poll tax, $17,000 ; from the proceeds of mines, $15,447, of which about $14,800 came from Storey County and the balance from Lander County. About $20,000 was realized from the stamp tax. The total receipts from all sources except bond sales during the first fourteen months of statehood ending December 31, 1865, were approximately $316,000. For redemption of territorial and state bonds, and for interest on the debt, the state during this period expended over $150,000, and the net state debt at the close of 1865 was approximately $423,000. The territorial debt inherited by the state was approximately $267,000. In refunding this, in meeting the high cost of financing under war-time conditions, and in paying the ordinary and extraordinary expenses of state government during the first year of its operation, Nevada at the end of 1865 had a debt considerably in excess of that at the close of the territorial period, and still faced the problems of financing in a period of depreciated currency and the high interest rates on bonds and temporary loans.[2]

NEVADA        227

Education and Public Welfare

Governor Blasdel in his message had expressed the hope that provision should be made for the establishment of a university, or welfare institutions and for state support to the public school system. But from the survey of state finance which has been given it is evident little money could be found for such purposes. Among other items in the expenditures during the first year of statehood was about $67,000 for the "soldiers' fund," and over $23,000 for the support of the State Prison. When these items are added to the interest and sinking funds of the state and territory, the various funds for the payment of salaries and other fundamental state expenses, little was left for the common schools and other institutional services. The item "for support of common schools" was about $3,000, but over $4,000 was assigned to "expenses of state library." By the act of February 14, 1865, the Secretary of State was made ex-officio state librarian. By that act, every officer of the state, civil and military, except commissioners of deeds and notary public, had to pay five dollars on the issuance of his commission, and every attorney, when admitted to practice, paid ten dollars, these fees being contributed to the library fund. Another act made it the duty of every county recorder to keep on file for public use copies of at least one newspaper published in each county.[3]

228      NEVADA

Nevada was a frontier state, and the population of its mining camps contained thousands of men who had cut away from the ties of home and civilization. Nevertheless, the school statistics would indicate no great disparity in the matter of homes and families. In 1865[4] there were approximately 4,500 white children under twenty-one years of age, while other classes reported included 121 Indian children, twenty-four Mongolian children and twenty-three negro children. There were 2,601 white children between six and eighteen years. The school register showed an enrollment of 1,994 pupils, but with an average daily attendance of only 886. It was reported that 725 children attended private schools and over 600 did not attend any school. Only one public school teacher had taught the same school for two consecutive years. There were doubtless at that time a number of "private classes" rather than "private schools" maintained. The oldest of the private schools was the Sierra Seminary at Carson City. The first territorial Legislature had authorized the incorporation of this seminary. "Miss H. K. Clapp, one of the earliest ladies to take up her home in Nevada, started a private school about that time (1861), and has been teaching a private school for boys and girls continuously ever since, under the name of the Sierra Seminary."[5]

While there was no money to establish a university, the Legislature by act of March 9, 1865, complied with the act of Congress of 1862 by giving the legal basis for "the Agricultural and Mechanical College of the State of Nevada," which was thus located "on paper" at some point in Washoe County. A board of regents was appointed, but they could not comply with the further requirements of the law for "the erection and preparation of the college" in the absence of any funds for that purpose. The first Legislature also had taken no steps toward establishing a university or mining school as provided in the constitution, and though the constitution provided that the special tax should be used for the support and maintenance of the university and common schools, the school law diverted all the funds from this source solely to the common schools. While the Legislature made no provision for a mining school, it created the office of state geologist and appropriated $6,000 to be expended on a geological survey under the direction of that official.

Pacific Railroad

Governor Blasdel devoted one paragraph of his message to the Pacific Railroad. "In view of the many advantages which would

NEVADA        229

be conferred upon the people, either in peace or war, by the completion of this road, it would seem that their interests justify the adoption of such legislative policy, within the limits of the constitution, and the financial ability of the state, as would most effectually aid and press forward this great enterprise of the age." Special committees were appointed in both houses of the Legislature to make an inquiry as to the progress of construction under the "Pacific Railroad Act" and also to inquire as to whether other companies proposed to build a railroad from California into Nevada, and whether any action of the Legislature could promote in a practical way these enterprises. In view of the bankrupt condition of the state government, and the general business depression among the people as a whole, it was scarcely possible to renew the agitation that had been before the constitutional convention to propose any material state aid. Nevertheless, the Legislature through its committees fully investigated and reviewed the merits of the controversy between the two parties which were striving to get the recognition and financial support of the government in building the first line over the Sierras. A resolution had been introduced in the Assembly in December, 1864, stating that the Central Pacific Company, for all the favors bestowed upon it by Congress, had constructed only about thirty miles, whereas another organization had built a road from the Sacramento River to the town of Latrobe, only thirty-eight miles from the capital of Nevada. A substitute was offered for this resolution and in February passed both Houses. It did not specifically name the rival of the Central Pacific, but it instructed Nevada's congressmen to secure the passage of a law proposing a subsidy or bonus of $10,000,000 to the corporation which should "first complete a line of railway and establish the same in perfect running order, with-out break or interval of stage transportation, between the navigable waters of the Sacramento River and the base of the eastern slope of the Sierra Nevadas."

The committees of the Legislature received a great mass of testimony and had before them as witnesses several officials of the Central Pacific, the Placerville and Sacramento Valley and the San Francisco and Washoe railroad companies.[6] Possibly the chief purpose of the investigation was to stimulate construction on the part of either of the rival organizations so that Nevada at the earliest date might secure railroad communication. Certainly Nevada at that time had nothing more than advice and moral encouragement to offer.

It was recognized that the plans of the Central Pacific Company did not conform to the local railroad needs of Nevada. There was another memorial and joint resolution passed by this Legislature petitioning Congress to grant $5,000,000 to the company which should construct, as a branch of the Pacific Railroad, a line connecting Virginia and Austin along the route of the overland mail road.

There were also two special acts of this Legislature, both passed over the governor's veto, authorizing the construction of a railroad from Virginia City to the Truckee River and to the Carson River,

230      NEVADA

these franchises being similar to earlier ones granted by the territorial Legislature. The franchise provided for a road to start at or near Virginia City, thence to or near the Half-way House on the Virginia City and Carson City road, thence through the Washoe Valley to a point near Fuller's Crossing on Truckee River. There was also to be a branch from this main road to Carson City. In the railway evidence procured by the legislative committee on railroads of the first Legislature is found a statement of the chief engineer of the Virginia and Truckee Railroad indicating that a survey had been made of the line showing the distance from Virginia City to Fuller's Crossing as 39.4 miles, and the branch from Washoe Divide to Carson City four miles.

Veto Messages.

In his inaugural address Governor Blasdel expressed an intention to cooperate with the Legislature and abstain from an interference with the authority expressly delegated to the legislative department. In one paragraph he called attention to the constitutional prohibition against the granting of special privileges. But in the course of the first session he had occasion to send in more than a dozen veto messages voicing strong expressions of disapproval to the Assembly or Senate. Some of these were much more vigorous than the general tone which characterized his inaugural address. The Legislature showed a tendency to disregard the pro-visions of the constitution in more than one particular. The revenue bills exceeded the constitutional taxing powers, and some one devised an ingenious method of getting around the constitutional prohibition against special franchises. There were also several "relief acts" which the governor vetoed on the ground that they were special bills. In the published laws there are three acts "authorizing" certain parties to maintain or construct toll roads, in addition to a general law prescribing the method by which toll road companies could be incorporated. Calling attention to a section in the constitution which prohibited special acts relating to corporate powers, the governor said : "This bill does not attempt to confer corporate powers upon Jerry Schooling and his associates; but it does attempt to confer special privileges upon them. And when they shall have obtained these privileges, they may then incorporate under the general incorporation laws of the state, and then they will be a corporation with special privileges conferred by act of the Legislature." But the Legislature was in no mood to appreciate the governor's exposition of constitutional law, and in most cases rode rough shod over his objections.

The governor was even more emphatic in his objections to the Virginia and Truckee Railroad bill. "This bill proposes to give to certain individuals the right-of-way for a railroad from Virginia City to Carson and the Truckee River, and in order to make the franchise more valuable, give them the exclusive right to run their road over a certain route, and protect them by saying that no other road shall be constructed within 1000 feet of theirs, during the next fifty years. The route named is the only feasible one between the points named. The several passes through which this road would run are so narrow, that to build any other road would be next to impossible. It certainly was not the intention of the framers of our constitution that ever a special franchise should be granted by the Legislature, except for municipal purposes; but, by

NEVADA        231

this bill, you grant not only a special, but an exclusive franchise for railroad purposes. . . . Besides these constitutional objections others of grave importance present themselves. This grant would create and defend a monster monopoly, cutting off most successfully all competition in the railroad business between Virginia and Carson, and between Virginia and the Truckee River, and intermediate points, for fifty years. It gives no guarantee that the road will be built, and no recourse for damages if not built. Its effect would be to retard, rather than encourage, the completion of a railroad from California to and across our state." The reply of the Senate to this message was passing it over the objections by a vote of thirteen to three, while in the Assembly the vote was twenty-nine to two.

[picture]

VIRGINIA & TRUCKEE RAILROAD DEPOT, CARSON CITY

Thirteenth Amendment.

It has been said that the chief justification for Nevada's early admission to the Union was to give a needed vote in Congress in the passage of the resolution submitting the thirteenth amendment to the states for ratification. On February 16, 1865, Governor Blasdel in a message to the Legislature reported that he had just received a dispatch from Nevada's Congressman, H. G. Worthington, stating that the congressional resolution had been concurred in and had been signed by President Lincoln, and that now it only remained to secure the ratification of three-fourths of the states "in order to rid the nation of the curse of slavery." The governor added : "Nothing, I am persuaded, would give greater satisfaction to the great majority of our constituents than to have Nevada enjoy the proud distinction of being the first state to move in the great scheme for rendering this nation truly a nation of free men."

Before the Assembly could take action on this matter, it received a message from the Senate asking concurrence in the joint resolution ratifying and confirming the proposed constitutional

232      NEVADA

amendment. It was adopted by a vote of thirty-one to one, and on the same day the Legislature adopted a concurrent resolution "that the governor be authorized and requested to telegraph to the President of the United States the resolution endorsing the proposed constitutional amendment abolishing slavery throughout the Union, which passed this day."[7]

First Congressmen and Senators.

The need of the vote of Nevada's congressmen in the concluding days of the Thirty-eighth Congress worked a peculiar situation. Henry G. Worthington, as has been noted, was elected as Nevada's representative on November 8, 1864. Since Nevada was entitled to representation as soon as the state was admitted, it is assumed that Worthington could use up his privileges either in what remained of the Thirty-eighth Congress or could have applied for qualification as a member of the Thirty-ninth Congress. But having taken his seat in the Thirty-eighth Congress, he was not eligible for the succeeding Congress except by reelection. Thus after March 4, 1865, Nevada had no representative in Congress until after a special state election in November, 1865. Worthington had come from Lander County, and the Republican convention after a notable contest chose another nominee from the same section of the state, Delos R. Ashley. In the election Ashley received 3,691 votes, and H. K. Mitchell received 2,215 votes.

In the meantime the Legislature in joint convention had elected the two United States senators. The joint convention was held December 15, 1864. The nominations were : William M. Stewart, of Storey County, Charles E. DeLong, of Storey, James W. Nye, of Ormsby, John Cradlebaugh, of Ormsby, and B. C. Whit-man, of Storey. DeLong had been one of the conspicuous members of the constitutional convention, while Stewart had served in the 1863 convention. Judge Cradlebaugh had been district judge under the Mormon regime. There were fifty-two votes in the joint convention and twenty-seven were required for choice. On the first ballot Stewart was elected, receiving thirty-three votes.[8] Each member of the joint convention had voted for two candidates. The result of the vote was : DeLong twenty-three, Nye twenty-three, Cradlebaugh twelve, and Whitman thirteen. The second ballot when each member voted for one candidate resulted as follows : Nye twenty-three, DeLong seventeen, Cradlebaugh nine, and Whitman three. The third ballot had the same results, and the convention was deadlocked in this position through the fourth and fifth ballots. One vote was transferred from Cradlebaugh to Nye in the sixth ballot, and after two more fruitless efforts the convention adjourned until the next day.[9] Whitman's name was with-

NEVADA        233

drawn, and on the ninth vote the result was : Nye twenty-nine, DeLong sixteen, Cradlebaugh seven.

After the senatorial ballot had been completed a resolution was offered that the convention should proceed to elect a United States senator to succeed the senator whose term would expire March 3, 1865. The resolution was voted down and a few days later the Senate adopted a resolution that no joint convention during that session should be called for the purpose of electing a successor to either Stewart or Nye unless a vacancy occurred or it was definitely determined that the term of one of the senators would expire in March, 1865. As a matter of fact Nye's term did not expire until March, 1867. The Legislature passed an act prescribing the manner of electing United States senators. Under the terms of this act no joint convention could be held for the election of United States senators except at the regular session of the Legislature which convened "next preceding the commencement of the term which is to be filled."[10]

Sutro Tunnel.

            One measure passed by the first Legislature was the act of February 4, 1865, "granting the right of way, and authorizing A. Sutro and his associates to construct a mining and draining tunnel." It escaped the objection of the governor on the score of being a special franchise, though it was a grant for fifty years of exclusive privileges, "to run, construct and excavate a tunnel running into the Comstock Lode," the purpose being to drain the Comstock Lode and other lodes along its line of direction or course, "and for the discovery and development of other lodes through which the same may pass, and for the general purpose of advancing the mining interests of this state."

            This was the legislative consent to the undertaking known as the famous Sutro Tunnel. Adolph Sutro was a native of Prussia, where he received a technical education, including a knowledge of metallurgy. He arrived in San Francisco in November, 1850, and was in business as an importer, retailer and wholesaler. In 1860 he and a partner established experimental metallurgical works in San Francisco. In 1861 he moved to Dayton, Nevada, and subsequently put up a mill for reduction of Comstock ores. According to Sutro's biographer, he became interested in the problem of draining and ventilating the Comstock mines, many of which were flooded at the lower levels, while others were unworkable on account of excessive heat and noxious gases. It was to solve these problems that he planned the Sutro Tunnel. The project involved the construction of a drainage and ventilating tunnel, approximately three miles long, starting from a point in the Carson Val-

234      NEVADA

ley and sloping upward sufficiently for gravity drainage until it intersected with the central mine of the Comstock group at a point more than 1600 feet below the surface. At the time this was regarded as the most stupendous feat of mining engineering ever attempted. The tunnel through a large portion of its length was fourteen feet wide and ten feet high, affording space not only for drainage and ventilation, but for two tracks of mine railway for handling of the ore and waste rock from the connecting shafts. On reaching the center of the group, various laterals were constructed so as to connect with individual mines. The legislative act above quoted gave Sutro and associates the privilege of making contract with the mining companies operating on the lode by which the tunnel company was to be paid a royalty on every ton of ore taken out of the mines benefited by the tunnel.

On July 25, 1866, Congress passed the "Sutro Tunnel Act," which in addition to providing for a right of way through the public land cut by the tunnel gave its promoters the privilege of purchasing over 4,000 acres at the mouth and to claim the owner-ship of the mines within 2,000 feet on either side of the tunnel. The bill also confirmed the royalty of two dollars a ton and made the patents of mining companies thereafter obtained subject to the condition that the royalty be paid.

After these plans had been fully matured, various mining and financial interests, particularly the group associated with the Bank of California, undertook to block the project, using every possible influence from annulling the contract between the mines and the tunnel company to bringing pressure on Congress to revoke the franchise. The people of Virginia City and Gold Hill became alarmed over the prospect that the center of mining activity would be transferred to the mouth of the tunnel. In the meanwhile Sutro had been unable to raise money either in New York or abroad.

A joint memorial and resolution of the Nevada Legislature, January 28, 1867, approved the project and instructed the senators and representatives to use their best endeavors to obtain from Congress aid to promote the construction and completion of the tunnel.[11] With this resolution Sutro went before Congress, and

NEVADA        235

succeeded in getting the House committee on mines and mining to recommend a loan to the tunnel company. But Congress adjourned without action on the report. During the summer of 1869 the House Ways and Means Committee came west, and during their tour they visited Virginia City and learned at first hand the conditions on the Comstock. Having failed to stir Congress or the large financial interests to practical participation, Sutro then carried his appeal direct to the people. He talked to the miners around the Comstock, pointing out the advantages of the tunnel and using as an apt illustration the loss of life that had occurred in the fire in the Yellow Jacket mine. The Miners Union subscribed $50,000, and this together with other pledges of assistance received from various parts of the United States enabled him to begin actual construction on October 19, 1869.

Not long afterward an effort was made at Washington to secure the repeal of an important section of the Sutro Tunnel act. The bill was defeated, but still financial assistance lagged. The outbreak of the Franco-Prussian war killed the prospect of raising loans in Europe. The organs of publicity to which financial interests had access did not hesitate to denounce the Sutro Tunnel as the scheme of a visionary and fanatical mining engineer. On April 4, 1871, by act of Congress, a commission was authorized to examine into the cost and utility of the work. The commission reported the project feasible, though not indispensable, and its cost at approximately $4,500,000. During that year Sutro arranged for a loan abroad, and most of the money that built the tunnel came from private capitalists in England and Germany. The bills providing a loan or subsidy for the enterprise from the Federal government never reached the stage of enactment.

The hostility of various organized cliques to the project was matched by unique engineering difficulties, perhaps the chief among which was the tremendous high temperature encountered as the bore proceeded. The workers had to labor in temperatures steadily increasing from 72 degrees Fahrenheit in 1873 until in 1878 the surface of the rock showed a temperature of 114 degrees. Men could only work a few hours at a time, not only because of the heat, but on account of the gases. Sutro himself took the lead, standing by his men and affording them an example of driving energy that refused to wilt under these circumstances. On July 8, 1878, more than eight years and eight months after the beginning of the work, he placed the last blast which opened a hole into the Savage mine.

Of the utility of the tunnel, a commentator writing about 1880[12] said :

236      NEVADA

The Sutro Tunnel was constructed chiefly with a view to facilitating the working of the Comstock mines, by ventilating and draining them, and transporting their ores to a point where they can be worked cheaply. It was also to serve as a channel for the transportation of passengers and supplies for the mines. While the tunnel has not thus far met all the expectations of its projector, it is a fact that it would be impossible to carry on the mining explorations on the Comstock at their present great depth of 3,000 feet, had it not been for the tunnel. As a means of ventilation it has failed. No rich ore bodies have ever been found in the course of its excavation, and this was one of the great dreams of its bold originator. . . . The greatest benefit, and an indispensable one at that, afforded by the tunnel is the increased facilities afforded by it for the drainage of the mines.

In 1879 Sutro sold out his stock in the company for a reported consideration of a million dollars and retired to San Francisco, where he died in 1898. Fifteen years after his death the Nevada Legislature by a joint resolution described the tunnel in words which constitute a high tribute to this mining engineer. A portion of the resolution read as follows :

Whereas, in the early history of Nevada, Adolph Sutro, who came to the state almost penniless, and by his indomitable perseverance and pluck constructed a tunnel which enabled the great Comstock Lode to be worked to a greater depth and is today recognized as the salvation of the ledge ; therefore, be it

Resolved by the Senate, the Assembly concurring, that the true merits of this stupendous undertaking, which added mil-lions to the wealth of this coast, and has been everywhere recognized as one of the great engineering feats of the country, should be recognized and acknowledged officially by the people of this state. Carried on as it was in the face of the most determined opposition, hampered by natural and financial difficulties, the subject of malignant and unjust attack, the final triumph of the undertaking which enabled the Comstock to be worked at an additional depth of 1,600 feet, demonstrated that Adolph Sutro was a man of extraordinary genius and ability, and one of whom the citizens of Nevada should feel justly proud.

Pioneer Settlements and Indian Warfare.

The preceding pages have presented the early state of Nevada largely from the standpoint of its most populous communities. Virginia City, the industrial metropolis, and Carson City, the capital, had hourly communication by telegraph with the news and market exchanges of San Francisco and eastern cities. There was the familiar expression of community pride in claiming for the cities of Western Nevada all the facilities and advantages found in other western cities. There were scores of business establishments, wonderful mines and reduction plants employing thou-sands. There were churches and schools, and the Legislature had even extended privileges to one or two societies for the promotion of education, literary and scientific interest. There were courts

NEVADA        237

for the orderly settlement of business disputes, though private quarrels were frequently adjudicated with fist or gun.

Altogether this is a picture of typical western civilization as it existed during the decade of the 1860s. But this picture cannot be made to apply to the state as a whole. When men went out, particularly into the region north and east, they were subject to adventures and dangers quite different from those to which they were exposed on the busy streets and around the mine shafts of the Comstock Lode. During the period of the Civil war and the years immediately following every section of the great overland stage and mail routes bore the brunt of a continuous and devastating Indian warfare. These hostilities had blazed out all the way from Eastern Nebraska, where the Sioux, the Arapahoe and Cheyenne were the principal aggressors, through Wyoming and Utah, until General Connor in 1863 broke the chief power of the Shoshone resistance in the battle of Bear River, and on westward to California, over the route where the various kinsmen of the Shoshones and the Pah-Utes were constantly restive and making trouble for travelers and settlers alike. Reservation Indians and wandering parties, in addition to the traditional resentment against the intrusions into this country, did not resist the temptation to kill or steal when conditions were favorable. From the overland trail north to the state line are scores of spots associated with fights in this period of irregular and guerrilla warfare.[13] A review of the Indian situation during 1865 is presented in the following quotation from Governor Blasdel's message of January, 1866:

In February last (1865) the Indians commenced a series of depredations in Humboldt County—burning houses, stealing stock, robbing, murdering, etc. Some of the leading citizens believing there were but few Indians engaged, wrote me for arms and ammunition, which were immediately for-warded to Hon. E. F. Dunne, at Star City, for distribution. But they soon learned that the number amounted to several hundred, and wrote me accordingly. I at once informed Gen. McDowell of the condition of affairs, and he promptly ordered the commander of this military district to send troops to their aid, which was done. The number sent, two companies, was soon found insufficient, and I again informed the General of the situation, whereupon he ordered two companies from the district of California, and one additional company from Nevada, to proceed as speedily as possible to the scene of action. About this time, two men, Stewart and Rabe, were murdered by the Indians at Walker Lake; and some stock was stolen on the Truckee River, and but for the wise management of Col. McDermit, and the judgment displayed by Capt. Wallace, at Walker Lake, there doubtless would have been bloody work; but they procured some friendly Indians to accompany them, and at early dawn of the 14th of March, surrounded the camp concealing the murderers. The Indians seeing their situation, gave themselves up, and they were conveyed to Fort Churchill.

238      NEVADA

The day Capt. Wallace started to Walker Lake, Capt. Wells was ordered to the vicinity of Pyramid Lake with a detachment of cavalry, where he encountered, about daylight of the 14th, some thirty odd Indians, including all classes ; he killed all save two, perhaps, which made their escape. This caused a great excitement among the Piutes, and a general war seemed inevitable. I wrote to Col. McDermit, and he sent invitations to their principal chiefs and captains to meet at the Fort. On the 22nd day of March, accompanied by Gen. J. L. Van Bokkelen, of the late Provost Guard, at Virginia, and a detachment of his men, I went to the Fort, where I found about one hundred Indians. The next day we had "a talk," when they became reconciled, and promised that no more depredations should be committed. Col. McDermit then called together those who aided to capture the murderers, at Walker Lake, and after hearing the particulars of what they did, I thought it but just, as well as good policy, to reward them, which I did by giving them money, and afterward flour, blankets, etc. To the credit of the Piutes be it said, since then they have given us no trouble, nor do I think they will, if properly cared for.

Indian troubles were feared in Lander County, in March, and early in April I sent the Lander Guard twenty stand of arms and ammunition. On the 5th day of May I received letters from Hon. W. W. Hobart, General Welty, and other leading gentlemen of Austin, asking aid, and giving information about stock having been stolen, and other offenses committed by the Indians. I caused fifty more stand of arms, with ammunition, to be sent to General Welty. On the 24th of May the Lander Guard asked of me to be ordered out, to go to Humboldt; I declined for the same reason given to three other military companies, to wit: A sufficient number of Government troops in the State, to put down the Indians, without embarrassing our treasury. On the 30th day of May I started from Fort Churchill, accompanied by Colonel McDermit and a detachment of cavalry, for Lander, to ascertain the condition of Indian affairs there. Arrived on the 2d of June, and on the 3d saw about one hundred and fifty of them, and had "a talk" ; but wishing to see more, I appointed the 6th to meet them again, where there were two hundred and sixty-six present. I told them we desired peace, but if they continued to steal, and commit other depredations, it would be necessary to make war upon them. I have heard no complaints against them since then.

Lack of time forbids detailing the incidents of my visits among the various tribes ; suffice it to say, some of their arguments were unanswerable ; they said, through their interpreter, "the white men cut down our pine trees, their cattle eat our grass, we have no pine nuts, no grass seeds, and are very hungry." I found them, in several instances, with nothing to subsist upon but rabbits, mice, grasshoppers, ants and other insects. It is to be hoped the General Government will do something to relieve their wants very soon ; if not, before the winter closes, they will be compelled to steal or starve, in large numbers. They should not be left in this condition. Much praise is due to our brave soldiers, for their success in

NEVADA        239

ending hostilities. I take this occasion, also, to return to Gen. Irwin McDowell the thanks of our people, for his promptness in their aid.

            Nor can I conclude without making mention of the fidelity and faithful services of Col. Charles McDermit, late commander of this Military District, who fell in defense of our borders, on the 7th of last August, in Paradise Valley, by a shot from an Indian. He was a most worthy gentleman, a well-skilled, faithful officer, and a brave, unflinching, patriotic soldier. His untimely end will be an irreparable loss to his family, and deeply felt by the community at large, who will ever bear him in grateful remembrance.

The excitement in Paradise Valley started in April. Settlements had begun in this "oasis" of Northern Nevada in 1864. Most of the settlers were concentrated around Willow Point, but some had pushed on north to Martin Creek and Cottonwood Creek in the vicinity of the present town of Paradise Valley. To them came friendly Indians who warned of an impending raid on the part of the Indians. A party of ten men, one boy, three women and four children, sought refuge in a place known as Hamblin's Corral, where with some nondescript firearms they stood off their assailants until assistance could come. One of the party, Thomas Byrnes, volunteered to go for help to Willow Point. He spurred his horse straight through the Indian line, escaped unharmed and reached Willow Point station in the afternoon. A rescue party was hurriedly organized. Though there were only twelve horses, one old veteran refused to be left behind, and holding on to the pommel of a saddle kept pace over the intervening distance of thirteen miles. Their approach caused the Indians to raise the siege and the entire party returned to Willow Point the next day. Later Lieutenant Wolverton with some soldiers visited the scene of the raid and discovered the bodies of two men, Collins and Fear-borne, who had stayed behind when the other settlers made their hurried exit, and who had been killed as they were forced out of their burning cabin.

After this raid the colonists returned to the upper portions of the valley and in July, Colonel McDermit assigned some of his forces to their protection. Both soldiers and settlers fought a pitched battle with the Indians on July 26, resulting in the death of twenty-three Indians and one citizen and one soldier, besides several wounded. For the protection of these exposed settlements Colonel McDermit established, on the west side of the Santa Rosa Mountains, in the Quinn River Valley and close to the Oregon line, Camp McDermitt. On August 7th, while returning to Camp McDermitt from Quinn's River Station, he was shot from ambush. His name is still retained in Nevada geography in association with the military reservation and the little settlement at the northern boundary of the state in Humboldt County.

While the fertile Paradise Valley was attractive for its agricultural possibilities, undoubtedly an important reason for the trend of settlement towards the north during this time was the mining excitement in Southwestern Idaho in the Owyhee country. There was a big rush to this district in 1865 and subsequently, and it was considered one of the richest placer fields, but the stubborn hostility of the Bannocks and other tribes involved the miners and

240      NEVADA

Indians in almost constant hostility. Nevada, as Governor Blasdel indicated, could not afford to maintain state troops in this region for its protection. The Nevada Senate in a memorial passed January 23, 1866, directed to Major General H. W. Halleck, who was then commanding the Department of the Pacific, made a plea for the distribution of adequate bodies of troops to patrol this region. The memorial summarizes the destruction that had been wrought by Indian hostilities and presented the case of the settlers not only with respect to Nevada, but Idaho as well.

From the first settlement of this State there has not been a year but what there have been depredations committed by some of the various tribes by which it is inhabited. Treaties have been made at various times with these tribes, only to be kept so long as suited the convenience and caprice of the Indians. Goods have been distributed among them almost yearly, though we fear that the appropriations of Congress have been, until recently, so managed as to benefit the Indian agents more than the Indians. During the past year there has been an Indian war in the northeastern portion of the State ; cattle and horses in large numbers have been stolen ; travelers, in large and small parties, have been attacked, and often massacred; families have been driven from their homes, their dwellings burned, and growing crops destroyed ; in fact, a large tract of country became unsafe to either live in or travel across, and an important line of communication between this State and the adjoining Territory of Idaho was closed, and still remains so to all, except large and well armed parties. Various military expeditions have been organized and sent against these Indians and many of them have been killed, but for want of steady, persistent efforts, proper equipment, and the right class of troops, they have all failed of accomplishing the desired end—a lasting peace. Quite a large force was put into the field last spring and accomplished much good, but now, when the winter has come—the very best time for operating against the Indians, having the double advantage of being the best time for troops to travel, and operations are more severely felt by the Indians at this season than any other—all but two companies of cavalry have been with-drawn, and these, we understand, are to be, and their places filled by regular infantry—an arm of the service utterly use-less for other than garrison duty in a country like that inhabited by the hostile Indians. It is with feelings of regret that we have to express the conviction forced upon us by the events of the past year, that the former chief military authorities at the headquarters of the Department of the Pacific, have wholly failed to understand the character of the country, the nature of the service, or the necessity of a vigorous prosecution of the war, until these Indians are completely subjugated or exterminated. We have no hope of a lasting peace so long as any number of them remains. They are inflicting a vast amount of damage, not only to this State, but also to the adjoining Territory of Idaho, greatly retarding, in fact, entirely preventing the settlement and cultivation of a large tract of agricultural land, the products of which are so important to the speedy development of the mineral wealth of a

NEVADA        241

community remotely situated from the ocean or other cheap means of communication.[14]

Over Northern Nevada during this period there were established a number of posts whose names frequently recur in connection with local history. These were not, properly speaking, forts in the sense of being fortified places. For the most part they were temporary garrison points, with a corral and with rough houses for the accommodation of the soldiers and the horses. The oldest of these dated from the establishment of the overland mail and telegraph, including Fort Churchill. In 1862 Colonel Connor established Camp Ruby in the Ruby Valley.

This camp was abandoned about 1869 and the troops moved to Fort Halleck, which had been established in July, 1867, a few miles southeast of the present town of Halleck. In 1866 Camp Winfield Scott had been established at the head of Paradise Valley for the protection of the settlers there, but this camp was abandoned in 1871 and the troops moved to Camp McDermitt. It was within two miles of Camp Winfield Scott that James A. Banks, one of Nevada's prominent pioneers and a member of the Constitutional Convention of 1864, was killed by Indian assassins in 1867.

First Institution of Social Welfare.

In his message of 1866 Governor Blasdel expressed the hope that as soon as finances permitted Nevada might do something for the benefit of the insane, blind, deaf and dumb. A bill originated in the Senate in this Legislature and received a majority in both Houses, diverting an appropriation for the benefit of the orphan asylum conducted by the Sisters of Charity at Virginia City. The report of the Senate committee in favor of this measure attempts to meet the constitutional objections made to its passage. By this report it is learned that the institution was opened October 16,

242      NEVADA

1864. By 1866 there were two three-story buildings, one of brick and one of frame, costing about $22,000. The committee pointed out that this was the only "really charitable institution in Nevada," so it might properly be termed a state institution, children being received from any portion of the state. The committee quoted the constitutional mandate that "other benevolent institutions" should be "fostered and supported by the state," and also argued that the prohibition against sectarian instruction did not apply to this case. But the governor vetoed the bill on the ground that the constitution made the individual counties responsible for the care of those who "by reason of age and infirmity or misfortune may have claim upon the sympathy and aid of society." Furthermore, he claimed that the corporation conducting the orphan asylum was not "formed by the terms of its articles for educational or charitable purposes, or for both." Consequently the state could not give its financial aid to the institution. "If this donation were made, it is but reasonable to suppose that others of kindred nature would be asked, and perhaps as justly made, which might, sooner or later, swell the liabilities of the state to the maximum so indicated (the constitutional limitation of debt) and thus indirectly render cur-rent expenses of the state more onerous." Since the state was then borrowing money at 18 per cent per annum, it was not in a condition to "make this donation, or any such, however laudable, irrespective of fundamental barriers."

But the next Legislature by act of March 19, 1867, appropriated $5,000, to be known as the "Orphan Asylum Fund," which could be drawn upon through the state board of examiners to pay claims "for the actual feeding and clothing expenses of the full orphans" under the care of the institution. The act also authorized the various counties to send to the "Nevada Orphan Asylum" any white orphan child or children under twelve years of age left parentless while residing in the state, and it was made the duty of the trustees or manager of the orphan asylum to receive and care for such orphan children without distinction or preference as to "the nationality or religion of the applicant."

The next Legislature, in 1869, made another appropriation "for fostering and supporting the Nevada Orphan Asylum," but at the same time it passed an act for the establishment at Carson City of a "State Orphan's Home," appropriating not to exceed $12,000 for the construction, completion and furnishing of the building. In January, 1870, the board of directors provided for by this act purchased a tract of seventeen acres at Fifth and Stewart streets in Carson City, and the contract for the building was awarded a few weeks later. It was provided that as soon as the building was completed the institution should receive the orphans supported by the state at the Nevada Orphan Asylum. While the Legislature in 1871 appropriated $20,000 for the support of the Orphan's Home, another appropriation of $5,000 was made to the Orphan Asylum fund to provide for the expenses of the children at the institution in Virginia City.


 

[1]An Assembly resolution, concurred in, December 21, requested the United States Senate to defer any action "in reference to the taxation and disposal of the mineral land, or the taxation of the mines, or the proceeds thereof," until Nevada's two United States senators might take their seat.

 

[2]The Constitution provides that all the lawful debts and liabilities of the territory should be assumed by the state. During the session of the 1867 Legislature an ingenious theory was developed to extend that responsibility to obligations incurred during the time that Nevada was a part of the Territory of Utah. This was in a Senate bill entitled "An Act to Make Compensation to the Hon. John Cradlebaugh, United States district judge, the same as that of the late United States district judges of the Territory of Nevada." In the report of the Senate committee on claims occur the following paragraphs:

We find that Judge Cradlebaugh, in 1859, was one of the associate judges of the Supreme Court of the Territory of Utah, and was at that time located at Salt Lake City, and dispensing justice in a manner not satisfactory to the Mormon population of that portion of the territory.

The Legislature of the Territory, at the session of 1858-9, established a district composed of the counties of Humboldt, Saint Mary's and Carson, which district substantially covered the territory which is now the State of Nevada, and assigned him to officiate in said district, which he did from August 1, 1859, until March 15, 1861, and had exclusive jurisdiction over all criminal and civil cases.

We find that the amount of business before his court was extensive, and which required the holding of court 181 days in 1860, some testimony going to show that he transacted more business than has ever been done by any other court during the same time either in the state or territory; that all the expenses of living and doing business in that day were much higher than since, and that the compensation paid by the Federal Government to its officials was totally inadequate to defray the necessary expenses of their positions.

The report then goes on to state that the three justices under the territory were paid a salary of $4,200 per annum in addition to what they received from the Federal Government. The report then continues: "This case is one of equity, and not based upon statutory law, as we are unable to find any act passed by the Legislature of either the State or Territory of Nevada, which assumed the indebtedness of that of any portion of Utah Territory out of which grew the Territory and State of Nevada; but we do find that former Legislatures, at a time when the cases were placed before them, have passed upon, allowed and ordered paid many if not all that have brought claims before them for services rendered in that portion of Utah which became Nevada; and we cannot see, as a matter of equity, why the State of Nevada is not as much bound to respect claims arising in Utah Territory where the benefits derived from such services are the legitimate heritage of the people of the State of Nevada, as though they did arise under the government of our own state." In view of the character of the services rendered by Judge Cradlebaugh the committee recommended that the additional salary compensation should be allowed. This bill passed both Houses at the close of the regular session, but in the special session that followed, Governor Blasdel vetoed it. In the course of the veto he said:

"During the years 1859, 1860 and a portion of 1861 the Hon. John Cradlebaugh held commission as a Federal judge, within and for the Territory of Utah. At the date of his appointment and commission by act of Congress then in force, his salary was fixed at $2,500 per annum. He therefore took the office and entered upon the discharge of his duties with full knowledge of the compensation he was to receive. He agreed to serve the United States and the people of Utah Territory for the salary fixed by law. . . . . Whether the compensation received was adequate or not, it must be apparent that the Hon. John Cradlebaugh has no claim, legal or equitable, against the State of Nevada, for increased compensation as United States judge of Utah." His service as United States judge ended with the act organizing Nevada Territory and he was at no time a judge of Nevada Territory. "It is true in the division into judicial districts, it was his fortune to be assigned to Carson County, out of which the present State of Nevada was carved; but Carson County did not agree to pay him additional compensation, nor did the Territory of Utah agree to pay additional compensation for the services rendered; and if the territory had so agreed, it would have become a legitimate claim against Utah, and not against the State of Nevada." The whole message seems to completely demolish this ingenious claim, and when the Senate voted on the measure in an attempt to pass it over the veto it did not get even a majority.

[3]On January 1, 1866, the State Library had 3,289 volumes, of which 881 were in the law department and 2,408 in the miscellaneous department. The report of the state librarian is an interesting exhibit of the type of general literature then accessible to the public officials and bar of the state. Most of the books were public documents, laws and court reports. Of the books received from the territorial library the only ones of a general literary interest were the works of John Adams and Thomas Jefferson. One exhibit is of books purchased "under an appropriation of Congress of March 3, 1863, received May 10, 1865." This list is apparently a collection of the standard literature of the day, corresponding roughly to the White House Library of recent years. The ancient classics are well represented. including translations of the Greek and Roman dramatists, orators and historians; the works of Addison, Byron, Bacon, Boswell's Johnson, Coleridge, Dryden, Hume, Macaulay, Smollett, Goldsmith, Gibbon, Irving, Lamb, Longfellow, Locke, Milton, Montaigne, Shakespeare. Apparently Emerson, Lowell and Hawthorne were not represented, but among the best sellers of the day was a volume of Uncle Tom's Cabin.

[4]First annual report of the superintendent of public instruction.

[5]Thompson and West's History, 1881.

[6]The printed results of this investigation are found in the appendix to the Journals of the Senate of the first session of the Legislature and comprise some valuable source materials for a detailed history of railroad beginnings on the Pacific Coast.

[7]This amendment was proclaimed as part of the constitution December 18, 1865.

[8]William Morris Stewart was born at Lyons, New York, August 9, 1827, and died in 1909. He left Yale College to go to California, arriving in San Francisco in May, 1850. After mining for a time he studied law, was admitted to the bar in 1852, and was attorney-general of California in 1854. He went to Virginia City in 1860, was interested in the Comstock Lode, served as a member of the territorial council in 1861, in the Constitutional Convention of 1863. He was reelected United States Senator for the full six-year term January 12, 1869. In 1887 he was again elected to the Senate and served consecutively for three terms, until 1905.

[9]During this interim, Mr. Stewart sent a message to Judge Cradlebaugh, stating that if the latter would consent to yield to him all government patronage, which would be due by courtesy to both of Nevada's senators, his election would be secured. The reply of Judge Cradlebaugh was characteristic of the man. `Tell Stewart,' said he, `that I had rather be a dog, and bay the moon, than such a senator.' "(Thompson and West's History of Nevada, 88).

[10]The election law of March 9, 1866, enumerates all the elective state and county officials, and in the case of the representative to Congress required that one such representative should be elected at the general election in 1866 and every second year thereafter. The governor, lieutenant-governor, secretary of state, state comptroller, state treasurer, attorney general, surveyor general, clerk of the Supreme Court and state superintendent of public instruction were to be elected at the general election in 1866 "and every fourth year thereafter."

[11]One paragraph of this memorial contains some statistics regarding the production of the Comstock Lode and some other facts regarding the mining situation, probably for the most part supplied by Sutro and his associates, but representing on the whole a fairly conservative approximation of data always subject to inflated figures:

That the mines of said lode have been worked for seven years last past, and during this time have produced $64,000,000; that the present annual yield is $16,000,000—an amount equal to the total annual production of the Republic of Mexico; that the expenses of working these mines so rapidly increase with the increased depth, that the $16,000,000 were last year realized at a cost of $15,500,000, and at the present ratio of cost to production their resources would, in a few years, be wholly absorbed and the mines practically abandoned; that the causes of increased cost are, amongst others, the accumulation of water in the mines, insufficient ventilation, and the increase of heat with depth; and that now, having reached a depth of 800 feet, these combined causes will prevent their being worked profitably on the present plan, below 1,200 feet; that the Comstock Lode is conveniently placed for deep drainage, being situated on the side of a mountain which declines into a valley, from which a horizontal adit or tunnel, four miles long, can be constructed, which will cut the mines at a depth of 2,000 feet; that this tunnel once constructed, these mines can be profitably worked to a depth of 3,000 feet, and by means of it at least a thousand millions of treasure will be secured; that the State of Nevada cannot render material aid to this indispensable work, by reason of Constitutional inhibitions; that the mining companies, while producing large amounts of bullion and distributing it among the channels of trade and commerce, under existing circumstances derive but an inconsiderable profit, and not equal, without Govern-mental aid, to the successful prosecution of such an undertaking; that the taxable property of the United States has been more than doubled within the last eighteen years, and this increase has mainly resulted from the vast addition to the precious metals within this time, and the further addition of one thousand millions would be an increase to that extent of the public resources, and virtually, a reducing to a considerable extent of the public debt.

[12]Thompson and West's History.

[13]Many of the stories, with all the grewsome details of border warfare, are found in Thompson and West's History of 1881, in Wright's History of the Big Bonanza, and in other early publications.

[14]There were similar resolutions passed in 1867. One of them reported the results of an investigation by a board of commissioners appointed by the previous Legislature to inquire into the losses sustained by the people of Humboldt County as a result of the Indian depredations during 1864-65-66, and estimated those damages to the amount of $151,422, declaring that the persons who had sustained these losses had a just and equitable claim against the Government therefor. Another resolution asked Congress, in view of the rapid increase of population in the eastern part of Nevada and the Territory of Idaho, to establish a daily mail through points in Humboldt County to Boise City. A resolution of March 1, 1869, stated the opinion of the Legislature that necessity no longer existed for the maintenance of the military posts of Fort Churchill, Camp Ruby and Camp Halleck "owing to the establishment of settlements contiguous thereto, sufficient in themselves for their own protection," and earnestly requested that those garrisons should be moved to the region north of the Humboldt River. A few days later another resolution was addressed to General Halleck asking that reinforcements be immediately assigned to the garrison of about sixty men at Camp McDermitt, where an Indian outbreak was being daily feared and where a larger force was needed "to protect the present settlers and encourage the settlement of extensive agricultural and mineral regions, and the trade and travel to and from Idaho."

In this connection should be noted a resolution of March, 1871, urging that Congress should secure the "annexation to Nevada of all that portion of Idaho Territory lying south of Snake River," declaring that the citizens of Owyhee County (Idaho) were in favor of such annexation and that the state line should not be allowed to divide the great "silver-bearing belts" which extended from Nevada north into this region, and also pointing out the "business and commercial relations which exist between our people and the people of the Owyhee portion of our neighboring territory."