Is It
Yucca, Or Is It Yucka, Yucka
by Johnny Gunn
For some, the possibility of a nuclear waste repository in Nevada is an
obscene gesture, while for others, it could be a panacea. This debate will
continue right up to the point the first load of waste arrives on site, and
is very much a part of this yearıs political agenda for many. The question
should be looked at from more than one angle, however.
Right at this moment, as you read this, more than 3,000 Nevadans are
working at the Yucca Mountain repository site. In dollar figures, itıs
estimated that almost $200 million has been added to the economy of the
Silver State through their wages, and the estimate for the future is that
the largest item in the gross state product could very well be the
repository.
Clark County, Nye County, Lincoln County, and Esmeralda County all stand
to reap tremendous economic benefits from the project if it should be built.
As far fetched as it seems, that 300 mile plus railroad could come to pass
and someone has to be there laying a road bed, transporting ties and rail,
driving spikes. Employees of the related projects, that is, railroad,
repository, et al, could have a total of more than a quarter billion dollar
payroll to spend.
Of course there are serious down sides to the question of whether the
Yucca Mountain Nuclear Waste Repository should even be. Nuclear waste is a
product that kills. This isnıt some harmful little spill that goes away.
Look up the half life of waste. Nuclear waste, if not handled properly, can
destroy ground water for thousands of square miles. Nuclear waste, if not
handled properly, can pollute the air and kill people, animals, vegetation,
for thousands of square miles.
And there is more to it than keeping it safe in an underground storage
facility. It has to get there, and I think most reasonable people would say
getting there is the most dangerous of all probabilities.
The question, as I see it, becomes not whether or not the repository will
be built, because a simple little visit to Washington, DC will answer that.
The current budget, as proposed by President Bush, recommends spending $880
million on the project this fiscal year, an increase of more than 50
percent. More than $6 billion has been spent on the project, and the
Department of Energy (DOE) is anticipating spending $58 billion before itıs
all over.
This war may be over, and to continue battling the windmill may not be
the right answer. The nuclear waste must be transported from various nuclear
facilities around the nation to where ever that repository ends up being
built. Trains derail in the this country so often that when one does, itıs
not even news anymore, and that is where the concentration of effort should
be for those who donıt want that waste facility in Nevada.
Centralized storage facilities are generally accepted, from an economics
angle, as best, but in the case of nuclear waste, economics must not be the
deciding factor. Safety should be more important than any other factor in
where facilities should be built, and how the waste should get there.
For decades, nuclear facilities around the country have been required to
maintain waste repositories on site, and that is the way it should remain.
If the government is willing to spend $58 billion over the next six years or
so, spend it at the site where the nuclear fuel is used. To transport
something as dangerous and deadly as nuclear waste, transport it thousands
of miles through thousands of towns, cities, and villages, threatening the
well being of millions of people, over a rail system that is less than
adequate, falling apart in many places, is almost criminal, particularly
when that waste is already being stored at the same location it was used.
The DOE is being sued by Nevada, by various nuclear energy providers, by
citizen groups, and all concerned have bowed their necks as a bull might
just before the charge. If someone doesnıt flinch soon, that ridiculous
railroad will be built, and the Yucca Mountain repository will be open for
business. Itıs time to change course, to concentrate on forcing the issue of
safety into the dialogue.
A Merger And
The Gaming Figures
by Johnny Gunn
There seems to be a correlation between the merger of the gaming giants
Boyd Gaming and Coast Casinos, and the financial figures released by the
Nevada Gaming Control Board for 2003. This correlation was voiced by a Reno
gaming figure, one who is responsible for what is often considered a
localsı club. That is, it isnıt the locals clubs that are feeling a
financial freeze, or at least, cooling off of desire to flip a card or roll
some bones.
Both Boyd and Coast are considered localsı operations, and a merger of
this size simply doesnıt take place among losers. Itıs all but a given in
Nevada, among Nevadans, I mean, that as a customer, you are treated far
better in a casino that caters to the localsı trade. Customer service
actually does mean something.
Southern Nevada hasnıt felt the pinch of Indian gaming the same as
northern Nevada, and it just might behoove some of the so-called big boys up
north to start remembering there are a few hundred thousand people in the
vicinity who call themselves locals. Itıs why one casino feels like a big,
cold, empty barn while the casino directly next door has people standing in
line.
LETTERS WE GET
Dear Editor,
I would like to respond to the recently published letter from Tom Herndon
regarding the flood control project.
Tom Herndon's recent criticism of the Washoe County flood control project
for not considering input from John Champion, the University and other
property owners was inaccurate.
The fact is that the Community Flood Control Coalition (CFCC) was the
most inclusive working committee of citizens I have ever witnessed.
The fact is that the University was welcome to participate and did to
some extent. That was their choice, not the committee's.
The fact is that the CFCC began after the death of John Champion, but
many of his friends and acquaintances were members of the committee and I am
sure that Mr. Champion's voice was heard and included in the comments made
during the numerous meetings.
Due to other endeavors I was unable to participate in the CFCC as I would
have liked, however I did attend four different meetings and I took note
that individuals and groups from all parts of the Truckee Meadows were
participating. I was impressed by the overwhelming community response in
trying to work out their differences and solve a major problem in our
community.
As to the Committee's expenditure of funds for food there were some
muffins, fruit and water available during these long meetings. The food was
paid for by various parties including the Truckee River Water Management
Council, the Truckee River Yacht Club, Hidden Valley and Rosewood Lakes
Homeowners Assns. Public $$ have never been spent on food.
So have a bottle of water and a banana Tom, and relax. I did.
Mike Robinson
(ed. note: Mr. Robinson is a Reno insurance executive and former
candidate for mayor)
|